Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 274 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than Galaxy A22, with a general score of 91.8 against 76.1. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is older than Galaxy A22, it's body is a bit thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A22, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bit bigger display and a better screen pixels density.
Galaxy A71 5G captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher resolution camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.