Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than Galaxy A22, with a 79.3 score against 76.1. The Galaxy S6 edge+ body is thinner and lighter than Galaxy A22, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has more processing cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much greater screen density and a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Galaxy A22 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in low light environments and a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.