Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's general score of 76.1. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is a lot newer and extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22's, but it's heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a much higher pixel amount per screen inch, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger display. Galaxy A22 features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.