Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A22, with a overall score of 78.8 against 76.1. The vivo X60 Pro is a a little thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than Galaxy A22, although both of them were released only 3 months apart. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has more pixels per display inch, a way higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite larger display. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22. Vivo X60 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same aperture and a 48 megapixels camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.