Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 71.9. The Galaxy Note9 is a way older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. Galaxy Note9 has a very superior CPU than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note9 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher pixel quantity per screen inch. The Galaxy Note9 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A23 5G has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.