Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, having a global score of 85 against 79.9. Although the iPhone 8 is way older than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. The iPhone 8 features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has 2 less cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a really larger screen, a really brighter screen, a little more pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Galaxy A25 5G has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.