Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. Even though the Apple iPhone XS Max is much older and a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has way less brightness, and they both have a screen of the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a bit higher display density and a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The iPhone XS Max counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.