Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. Despite of the fact that the Google Nexus 6P is way older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Nexus 6P features a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite lower pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display. Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G captures better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.