Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 is an older phone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but Google was able to make it just a little thinner and much lighter. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.