Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is slightly better than LG V20's 77 general score. Although the Galaxy A25 5G is way newer than the LG V20, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V20 features a much powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than LG V20, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V20, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots better photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a larger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.