Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is a bit better than LG V30's 79.1 score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is way newer than LG V30, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A25 5G has a little more vivid screen than LG V30, because although it has a lot worse pixels density and a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. LG V30 counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.