Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. The LG V50 ThinQ is a just a bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but both are 0.33inches thick. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy A25 5G, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A25 5G counts with greater battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in low light situations and a tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.