Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a 79.9 score against 76.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and much newer. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has older 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, a lot more megapixels back camera and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.