Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. Galaxy A25 5G's body is extremely newer and just a little thinner, but a bit heavier than Moto G Stylus. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11, so it provides you lots of additional features and improved performance.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bigger display.
Moto G Stylus has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has greater battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.