Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 86.2 score against 79.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Although it's the best we are comparing here, Motorola Moto G200 5G's construction is a lot older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than Galaxy A25 5G.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G200 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G have very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.