Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than Moto Z4, having a 79.9 score against 79.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer cellphone than the Moto Z4, although it's heavier and thicker.
Moto Z4 counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Moto Z4 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.