Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, having an 87.1 score against 79.9. Even being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is an a lot older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier phone than the Galaxy A25 5G. The Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy Note9 has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A25 5G captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A25 5G features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.