Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Both of these devices include the same Android 14 operating system, so they should provide the user identical operating system features. Galaxy A25 5G's construction is noticeably thicker but somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and both were released only 4 months apart.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a little higher display density, a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a bigger display and a really brighter display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a 50 mega pixels back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.