Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a 79.9 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G construction is incredibly newer than the vivo X60 Pro's, but it is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Galaxy A25 5G has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features longer battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.