Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body is just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it's a little bit thicker and was released 5 years before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit bigger display and way more brightness. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 768 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.