Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power has a global score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25's 74.3 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Moto G Power has the older 11 version while Galaxy A25 has Android 14 version. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Moto G Power construction is a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A25.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a really superior performance than Galaxy A25, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A25 has a bit sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little lower pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto G Power, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G Power counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A25, because although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light images.
The Moto G Power features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A25.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.