Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ3 is slightly better than Galaxy A25, with a 79.6 score against 74.3. The Xperia XZ3 design is just a little lighter but somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A25. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A25 has Android 14.
Sony Xperia XZ3 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A25, because although it has a quite smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Sony Xperia XZ3 has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Sony Xperia XZ3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A25, although it has a way worse resolution camera and a smaller camera aperture.
The Galaxy A25 has a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3330mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.