Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A25's 74.3 general score. Both phones in this review have the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so both of them should offer identical operating system features. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is somewhat heavier but incredibly thinner than Galaxy A25.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A25, because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of display, much more brightness, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A25, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little better battery life than Galaxy A25, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.