Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 79.6 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A30 body is a lot newer, just a bit lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Droid Turbo captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a much better video resolution.
Galaxy A30 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A30 features a bit better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.