Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy A30's 79.6 general score. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is a lot newer than the Galaxy A30's, although it's a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A30, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A30, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.