Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-03-02 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Galaxy A30, having a score of 90.5 against 79.6. The Galaxy A90 5G is a just a bit thicker and heavier phone than Galaxy A30. Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back, a way larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy A90 5G has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.