Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having a general score of 79.6 against 78.8. Galaxy A30's body has the same thickness than vivo X60 Pro, but it's just a little lighter. Vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit larger display.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a better performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.