Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s's 79.8 general score. The Google Nexus 6P body is just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, although it's a little heavier and was released 4 years before. Google Nexus 6P features a sharper display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Google Nexus 6P has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a much lower resolution camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video definition.
Galaxy A30s counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A30s also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A30s has a little longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.