Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a 79.8 score against 76.4. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A30s has older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy A30s is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a bit lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A30s features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture and a back camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.