Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A30s's 79.8 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is way newer, but a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A30s. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11, so it gives some additional features and increased performance.
Galaxy A30s features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 features a way better screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a way better amount of pixels per screen inch, a little bigger display and a way better 1220 x 2712 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a lot better resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A30s has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.