Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, with a 79.8 score against 79.7. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Samsung Galaxy A30s is a thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Moto G Stylus, even though they were released with only 7 months difference.
The Moto G Stylus has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A30s. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Moto G Stylus counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size screen, the Moto G Stylus also has a better screen density and a much better 1080 x 2300 resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features as much storage capacity for apps and games as Galaxy A30s, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
The Moto G Stylus features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Galaxy A30s one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.