Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s is a bit better than the Moto Z4, getting a 79.8 score against 79.8. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A30s is a just a little heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Moto Z4. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A30s has a newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features.
The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a way better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy A30s and Moto Z4 both count with very similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and equal internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30s. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Moto Z4 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s features just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.