Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting a general score of 81 against 79.8. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A30s, but it's heavier and was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count in each inch of display and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A30s takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A30s also has a larger camera aperture for better low light images and video and a camera with way more MP. The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery life is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy A30s.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.