Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 79.8 against 77.8. The Galaxy A30s construction is notably lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's way thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A30s has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a lot greater quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A30s has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much more megapixels camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A30s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.