Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30s is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a general score of 79.8 against 78.8. Galaxy A30s's body has the same thickness than the vivo X60 Pro, but it's a little bit lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a lot higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy A30s counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.