Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 score. The Galaxy A31 design is much newer, but thicker and a little heavier than the Google Nexus 6P. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Google Nexus 6P and Samsung Galaxy A31 feature quite similar processing units, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a way better resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a much better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.