Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 76.4. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy A31's design is noticeably newer and thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is also just a little heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processor than Galaxy A31, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A31 counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A31 has a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a F2 aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also has faster video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.