Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a little bit better than Moto Z4, getting a score of 81.3 against 79.8. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Samsung Galaxy A31's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Moto Z4. The Moto Z4 has a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in Galaxy A31, they have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A31 also has a little better pixels number per display inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Moto Z4 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Moto Z4 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera in the back and a same size sensor, the Moto Z4 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a much better video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.