Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-27 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting an 81.3 score against 81. The Galaxy A31 construction is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but incredibly thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A31 has an older 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a CPU that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A31's CPU, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A31 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A31 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A31 features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A31 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.