Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. IPhone XS Max is an a lot older and a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A32 5G, but Apple was able to build it thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a lot greater pixel quantity per display inch and a way higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
Galaxy A32 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 5G also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. IPhone XS Max features a really superior performance than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Galaxy A32 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.