Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has a general score of 79.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G's 75 global score. LG V30's body is a lot lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released many years before. The LG V30 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
LG V30 features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V30 counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V30 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A32 5G features a little bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.