Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's score of 75. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. The Motorola Droid Turbo body is somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, but it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Galaxy A32 5G features a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A32 5G also has faster video frame rate, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A32 5G has greater battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.