Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than Galaxy A32 5G, having a 77.9 score against 75. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple additional features. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A32 5G, although it is thicker and was released 6 years before.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Galaxy A32 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Galaxy A32 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also has better video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low light situations and a lot higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.