Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic indigo |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G's global score of 75. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. The Motorola Moto G Stylus is a just a bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy A32 5G, but they are 0.36inches thick.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch in the display and a lot better 1080 x 2300px resolution. Moto G Stylus features a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM. The Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy A32 5G has longer battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.