Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's global score of 75. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is an extremely older phone than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note9 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit more storage for apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note9 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A32 5G has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images and videos in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A32 5G has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.