Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting a general score of 79.1 against 75. The Xperia XZ2 design is a little lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, although it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. Xperia XZ2 features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution.
Sony Xperia XZ2 features a very superior processing power than Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Xperia XZ2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A32 5G has a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.