Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is better than Galaxy A32 5G's 75 score. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lot older than the Galaxy A32 5G, it's design is a little bit thinner and lighter. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2246 resolution and a greater display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A32 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A32 5G has greater battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.