Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-25 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only, with a score of 83.7 against 82. These devices have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11. The LG V50 ThinQ is a incredibly heavier device than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, but both of them are 0.33inches thick.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only and LG V50 ThinQ feature incredibly similar displays, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a display of the same size. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with improved battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light environments, worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a way worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.