Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only construction is a lot newer, thinner and much lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels count in each inch of display. Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, higher 30 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only features longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.