Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a general score of 82 against 77.9. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and notably lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has better video frame rate, a bigger aperture and a way more MP back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.